Skip to main content

AS201043

emmatech

Emma Technologies Sarl

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
201043
Name
emmatech
Organisation
Emma Technologies Sarl
Country
—
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

2

IPv6 prefixes

1

Total announced

3

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS201043
2.152.70.0/23 IPv4 /23 not checked
2.152.69.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
2a10:7987:8100::/40 IPv6 /40 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS201043
Address families
LU-CIX 10,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS201043 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

6 networks seen before AS201043 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS15965 AS15965 395 868
v4 v6
AS174 COGENT-174 46 61
v6
AS6939 HURRICANE 22 46
v4
AS34019 HIVANE 4 15
v4 v6
AS25091 IP-Max 2 11
v4 v6
AS20766 1 2
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS201043 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

5 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS24482 SGGS-AS-AP 1 27
v4 v6
AS2027 MilkyWan 1 3
v4 v6
AS36236 NETACTUATE 1 3
v4 v6
AS56987 AS-ABACLOUDA 1 3
v4 v6
AS209823 1 3
v4 v6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.