Skip to main content

AS200258

MIKEBRESSEM

AS6939 - Hurricane Electric

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
200258
Name
MIKEBRESSEM
Organisation
AS6939 - Hurricane Electric
Country
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

0

IPv6 prefixes

1

Total announced

1

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS200258
2001:67c:b50::/48 IPv6 /48 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS200258
Address families
BGP.Exchange - Dusseldorf 1,000 Mbps IPv6
LOCIX DUSSELDORF: Peering LAN 1,000 Mbps IPv6
LOCIX FRANKFURT: Peering LAN 1,000 Mbps IPv6

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS200258 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

8 networks seen before AS200258 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS6939 HURRICANE 157 217
v6
AS34549 MEER-AS 41 53
v6
AS41051 FREETRANSIT 37 46
v6
AS34872 Servperso_Systems 21 31
v6
AS25091 IP-Max 3 6
v6
AS34927 iFog-GmbH 2 2
v6
AS48646 1 1
v6
AS401753 1 1
v6

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS200258 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

7 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS24482 SGGS-AS-AP 1 3
v6
AS42541 1 1
v6
AS51185 MAINSTREAMING-AS 1 1
v6
AS56662 1 1
v6
AS199854 1 1
v6
AS210937 Showfom 1 1
v6
AS213151 1 1
v6

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.