Skip to main content

AS199978

NETCOM

Robert Jerzy Opielinski trading as NETCOM COMPUTERS

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
199978
Name
NETCOM
Organisation
Robert Jerzy Opielinski trading as NETCOM COMPUTERS
Country
—
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

3

IPv6 prefixes

0

Total announced

3

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS199978
185.155.40.0/22 IPv4 /22 not checked
91.231.72.0/23 IPv4 /23 not checked
91.231.74.0/23 IPv4 /23 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS199978
Address families
EPIX.Katowice 11,000 Mbps IPv4
EPIX.Poznan 10,000 Mbps IPv4
EPIX.Warszawa 10,000 Mbps IPv4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS199978 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

4 networks seen before AS199978 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS62081 EPIX-WAW-GlobalMix 179 371
v4
AS50607 EPIX-KTW-GlobalMix 27 58
v4
AS212261 EPIX-POZ-GlobalMix 15 29
v4
AS201054 EPIX-PolMix 12 28
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

1 networks seen after AS199978 in AS paths

Observed downstreams
Families
AS52203 MLAB-AS 67 86
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Uncertain adjacencies

2 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS24482 SGGS-AS-AP 1 4
v4
AS49544 i3Dnet 1 3
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.