Skip to main content

AS197166

GOTSCHNA-AS

Gotschna Limited

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
197166
Name
GOTSCHNA-AS
Organisation
Gotschna Limited
Country
—
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

1

IPv6 prefixes

2

Total announced

3

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS197166
79.170.193.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
2a0d:5700::/48 IPv6 /48 RPKI valid
2a0d:5700:cafe::/48 IPv6 /48 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS197166
Address families
LONAP: LON0 1,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS197166 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

12 networks seen before AS197166 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS6939 HURRICANE 120 158
v6
AS20473 AS-VULTR 126 156
v6
AS52025 PARADOXNETWORKS-LIMITED 120 139
v4 v6
AS33891 CORE-BACKBONE 7 9
v4
AS22356 ASN22356 7 7
v4
AS8218 NEO-ASN 4 7
v4 v6
AS14840 ASN14840 2 4
v4
AS39351 ESAB-AS 1 2
v4 v6
AS4455 BSO 1 1
v4
AS6204 ZET-NET 1 1
v4
AS9009 M247 1 1
v4
AS263444 ASN263444 1 1
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS197166 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

5 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS24482 SGGS-AS-AP 1 4
v4 v6
AS48185 team_blue 1 2
v4 v6
AS49544 i3Dnet 1 2
v4 v6
AS50300 CUSTDC 1 2
v4 v6
AS34927 iFog-GmbH 1 1
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.