Skip to main content

AS196879

VolkhovOnline

.

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
196879
Name
VolkhovOnline
Organisation
.
Country
—
RIR
RIPE
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

1

IPv6 prefixes

0

Total announced

1

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS196879
193.106.108.0/22 IPv4 /22 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS196879
Address families
DE-CIX Frankfurt: DE-CIX Frankfurt Peering LAN 1,000 Mbps IPv4
PITER-IX Riga: RIX_PEERING_VLAN 10,000 Mbps IPv4
PITER-IX Saint-Petersburg: SPB_PEERING_VLAN 10,000 Mbps IPv4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS196879 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

8 networks seen before AS196879 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS31133 MF-MGSM-AS 233 296
v4
AS6939 HURRICANE 19 20
v4
AS25091 IP-Max 4 8
v4
AS49434 FBWNETWORKS 2 2
v4
AS61049 EXASCALE 2 2
v4
AS9198 KAZTELECOM-AS 1 1
v4
AS21030 CDNNOW-AS 1 1
v4
AS44843 MALOCO-AS 1 1
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS196879 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

5 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS24482 SGGS-AS-AP 1 9
v4
AS28910 INTAL-ASN 1 1
v4
AS34927 iFog-GmbH 1 1
v4
AS37721 ORG-VTS1-AFRINIC 1 1
v4
AS41722 MIRAN-AS 1 1
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.