Skip to main content

AS149926

IDNIC-IWS-AS-ID

PT Ilham Wifi Solution

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
149926
Name
IDNIC-IWS-AS-ID
Organisation
PT Ilham Wifi Solution
Country
Flag of Indonesia ID Indonesia
RIR
APNIC
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

2

IPv6 prefixes

0

Total announced

2

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS149926
103.191.154.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
103.191.155.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS149926
Address families
DE-CIX ASEAN 10,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
DE-CIX Jakarta 10,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
Transhybrid IX Network 100,000 Mbps IPv4

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS149926 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

1 networks seen before AS149926 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS24534 TRANSHYBRID-AS-ID 268 754
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS149926 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

5 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS24482 SGGS-AS-AP 1 2
v4
AS35280 F5 1 2
v4
AS38001 NEWMEDIAEXPRESS-AS-AP 1 2
v4
AS63516 1 2
v4
AS199524 GCORE 1 2
v4

No rows match “”.

Showing of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.