Skip to main content

AS11525

HRTC

Hancock Rural Telephone Corp.

Registry

Authoritative registration data

AS number
11525
Name
HRTC
Organisation
Hancock Rural Telephone Corp.
Country
—
RIR
ARIN
Registered
Source:asn:rdap retrieved

IPv4 prefixes

7

IPv6 prefixes

1

Total announced

8

Announced prefixes

Observed in BGP by route collectors, not a registry allocation list

Prefixes announced by AS11525
204.8.8.0/21 IPv4 /21 not checked
208.70.40.0/21 IPv4 /21 not checked
208.88.248.0/21 IPv4 /21 not checked
64.184.8.0/21 IPv4 /21 not checked
74.112.112.0/21 IPv4 /21 not checked
168.100.180.0/22 IPv4 /22 not checked
63.208.139.0/24 IPv4 /24 not checked
2606:5d00::/28 IPv6 /28 not checked

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:ripestat:announced-prefixes observed

Internet Exchanges

Exchanges where this network has a listed peering LAN connection

Internet Exchange memberships listed for AS11525
Address families
DE-CIX Chicago 100,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6
FD-IX - Indianapolis 100,000 Mbps IPv4 · IPv6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Source:peeringdb retrieved

Exchange membership means the network has a listed connection; it does not prove peering with other members.

Observed adjacencies

Networks seen next to AS11525 in BGP paths by route collectors.

Source:ripestat:asn-neighbours observed

Observed upstreams

5 networks seen before AS11525 in AS paths

Observed upstreams
Families
AS6939 HURRICANE 224 2,089
v4 v6
AS6461 ZAYO-6461 43 505
v4 v6
AS174 COGENT-174 31 222
v4 v6
AS3356 LEVEL3 24 153
v4 v6
AS25091 IP-Max 2 25
v4 v6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Observed downstreams

0 networks seen after AS11525 in AS paths

No downstreams observed

This AS was not seen carrying traffic towards another network.

Uncertain adjacencies

2 adjacencies that may be an artefact of collector peering

Uncertain adjacencies
Families
AS19151 BBO-1 1 16
v4 v6
AS49544 i3Dnet 1 16
v4 v6

No rows match “”.

Showing – of

Note:
These are observed adjacencies derived from BGP path data, not confirmed commercial relationships. A network appearing before another in an AS path does not establish that it is a paying transit customer, a settlement free peer, or anything else contractual. Adjacencies marked uncertain were seen only as direct peers of a route collector, so the collector's own peering may have created them.